Yes she earns that fair in square, Its called curation. Are you accusing her of making too much money?
Maybe steem should enable a hard cap o how much money you can make, see how many people actually stay lol
If 6th day voting was wrong it wouldn't be allowed in the code.
She doesn't do anything every other big whale does, and nothing is wrong with it
There is no such thing as @reward pool rape
ask @inertia
Logically and ratinally, raping the rward pool ro "stealing" from the reward pool is an invalid concept
I ap[recote the effort to go and research potential problems by berniesander
i aprecioate any whale who has the intent of helping steemit ensure rewards go to the highest quality psts as possible
but if someone has steempower thats their private property and the reward pool is NOT garunteed to ANYONE else but Steempower holders.
sweetsssj p[rovides content that some may not like but MANy do and THAT is ALL that matters END OF STORY
She GETS the upvotesm she HAS the support from EARLy users BIG users who delaget her steempower who she has gotten wealthy with from the beginning fair in square hard work posting evryday curating like CRAZY upvoting ALL the ge of stem
she sits theer and UPVOTES al day CURATES a LOT and find VERY valuable users all day everyday and we cannot sit here and crab bucket dance and act like there is something wrong with her making money
she could have powered down a year ago and kept Bitcoin or ethereum and made WAY more money DUMPING steem and just pushing steem even further down, whales like her keeping steem hold steem high, they sacrifice money they COULD just make holding Bitcoin and make WAY more money but they make a TIN bit of steem in teh reward pool as conselation prize nd the minnows and plankton just complain, and its crazy, without the whales making THEIR money the DOlphins and Minnows wouldnt make ANY of their small pieces of steem, the whales make the BIG pieces and their crumbs are wht give the smaller users ANY value it IS a trickle down proof of stake system, the majority of steem isnt held by a large user base yet the majority of steem is held by a small minority and thats fine,
Another ignorant sheep...
Go back to school for a real education ya moron. Nobody is going to read bullshit ramblings with 0 punctuation and grammar of a 10 year old.
Dear @berniesanders, I want to ask you a question: Isn't it all a problem of how the whole system is build? I deeply respect the idea of freedom behind the blockchain and Steemit. But who can decide where the boundaries are? In some way the community takes care for itself. But it creates a lot of discussing, where noone seems to be right. They call you a communist. So trying to fight for social behaviour to some around here is the same as being a communist. When you criticize some peoples behaviour, they answer with "The system doesn't say, it's illegate to do so". Though many of us carry along a feeling of immorality regarding this behaviour. Shouldn't the system itself provide more boundaries, so people can't come up with telling us: "it is possible to do so, so I do it and there is nothing wrong about it"? Why is abusing the community possible, when it's all about being a great community? When I got something wrong, please don't flag me. Please answer my questions instead so I can learn.
Crypto are finite, unlike FIAT. There is a cap to the rewards that can be shared amongst all posts. The reward someone gets from his posts lowers when the SBD value drops or abusers do these tricks to get a bigger piece of the pie.
I know. My question of how this is possible was meant rethorical. By the way: how often did you make this comment???
"They call you a communist. "
Because he is one by definition. If you use a term like "XXXX is making too much", you are pretty much a communist.
A communist to me is someone who wants a society by dictatorship, where everyone earns the same money. This is far away for me from criticizing when some earn much more than others because of an acting that is blind for the community and the relations in it. There are shades in between capitalism and communism.
I'm new here, but have been following crypto since 2013, to say @ackza is ignorant is a little harsh @ackza is correct in saying that @sweetsssj could have powered down at any time to invest in something else. In fact you only really want to hold shitcoins like steem when we are in a shitcoin season, or you will definitely lose money. So i don't really know what the deal is with @sweetsssj but by just holding steem over time means she has definitely contributed to it's success.
The account doesn't really hold much Steem. Most of her voting power comes from other accounts delegating to her.
She is sending the rewards from her delegated steem power to her friends and family, according to her. They according to the blockchain are mostly cashing it out.
The question at hand is "Is that good for SteemIt, or not. If it is bad, what is the solution?
Flagging you on this comment for
-abuse of your multiple sock puppet Steemit accounts used to upvote yourself
-abuse of your multiple sock puppet Steemit accounts to abusively downvote other Steemers.
-unmerited rewards
-hate speech and trolling