It's a sad truth that even if we have the best content in world, still it doesn't guarantee good rewards because it greatly depend on who has the power. In terms of learning, it's immeasurable, because we learned a lot from our content.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I believe that after Hard Fork 19, the minows had more power, but at the same time the interaction died on the platform. No one else votes, nobody else comments and only the so-called "Steemit celebrities" have some success with their posts. This created a monopoly, as every government and in a decentralized government is no different and this is bad.
When creating monopolies, those at the bottom will never have their success and this is sad seeing Steemit as the biggest opportunity for content generators to earn for their posted content.
And the same time, the power of the whales had increase exponentially. You are wrong when you said nobody is voting. Voting is there but with the same authors all day long.
First of all, with all respect I´m jumping in these conversation...
So @juvyjabian If the whale votes between them the power voting will be on the top... Nobody on the bottom will be affected for... So that is a kind of monopoly or something like a "The Whale Club". Looking for this perspective, What the chance that someone in short time will be part of this club? So... I guess that we need to talk about that for they change the rule for democratize the SteemIt. Or for create a rule that equalize this situation.
Thanks for joining in. You are right, a discussion could be good starting point.