KYC and identifiable profiles kind of already self limit the abuse. People are less likely to "misbehave" if their identity is known.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
KYC and identifiable profiles kind of already self limit the abuse. People are less likely to "misbehave" if their identity is known.
Exactly :)
So for that reason I think we'll always need to combat blatant abuse.
Most downvoting IS blatant abuse...
I disagree but would need to look at 2000-3000 daily downvotes individually to be sure.
Thing is - none of us want to name the accounts - I know what happens if I do that from Steemit - but we all know which accounts have been abusing the system for the past four years don't we? And it's not like we have to research it - anyone who has been here long term knows. The account names may change from time to time, but they are not even trying to hide.
Top downvoters since Hive.
dein-nostake-problem, I would say is abuse but is pointless.
fersher and stimialiti, bitter and stakeless nobhead, also abuse.
The rest i am not sure.
How about value rather than quantity?
More work but might highlight some new names or at least affect the order of the list.
There will certainly be some downvotes I disagree with but there is also a lot of shit/abuse which needs constant monitoring.