http://www.conspiracyoflight.com/Sagnac/SagnacEarth.html
What about the lunar eclipse, with the shadow of the earth upon the moon, and equally what about the floating "curved spinning balls" which can be verified with a direct observation from ANY store-bought telescope, or the logical proof that such a conspiracy would require the largest co-operation between nations and across millennia, without ANY discernable benefit for the co-conspirators?
Have you tried to examine the size of the "spinning curved ball" and exactly what altitude the curvature would be unmistakably obvious, with ANY number of 3D modeling programs by creating a sphere with enough faces to form a semblance of curve (not angular) and positioning a feature of off the surface that you can position a camera on top to "see" what the curve would look like from that altitude?
I'll post some quick renders to demonstrate.
Thanks for your response,
The lunar eclipse is on my list of things I need to examine, seems to be used by both sides of the argument a lot.
As far as the scope is concerned, I’ve spent an equal amount of time examining my own jaded psychology. You need to ask yourself about the truth & representation of the death of jfk, the moon trips, the twin towers & numerous other events. If you believe the main media story on those, probably not gonna get anywhere with a flat earth. However if you see problems with all of those things why would you trust other giant things requiring a leap of faith, that in my view contradict physical experience.
Also the unheard of peace regarding the Antarctica treaty is strange. They also get a lot of important traffic there.
There are alternate explanations for planets & retrograde motions that make more logical sense to me. I’ll find some links for that & a lunar eclipse. Thy are all theoretical models
Would love to see any good 3D modeling
Looking at the sky to measure the Earth is irrelevant: EVERYTHING in modern astronomy about stars are assumptions. The facts are that all large bodies of water are level, the Earth has no measurable curvature and it does not accelerate.
Giant theoretical models that get bigger & longer & farther away all the time, yet are said to be known facts 👍
I do not assume that all of the history that has been taught to me is accurate. Therefore I can not assume that I know exactly what has been known for millenia. Judging by the history I’ve been alive for, things are constantly remixed by the authors.
I also can’t assume I know all possible reasons others have for their actions. Many more possibilities exist than any one mans imagination in my opinion.
Spiritual deception is very common from what I’ve seen, televangelists come to mind, psychics, tarot cards, palm reading, pedophile churches.
But the basic physics that we experience are a better argument than vague broad topics.
Does the spin of the earth affect airplanes?
Stick to logic, no need to make assertions about me.
You seem to be lacking the ability to have a logical discussion without trying to make things personal.