I had no idea burning down buildings, beating up random white people, breaking down fences to private properties, burning homeless camps,taking over city blocks with sub machine guns, burning cops cars, chocking cops out, and shooting random people was a peaceful protest.
Anarchy and Communism {socialism} is the stupidest shit I've ever heard in my life. Maybe you should read a history book. In China they used "youth brigades" to protest everything. Any they were VERY liberal and pro women.Then when Mao actually came to power he literally passed laws about having only 2 children and how men are better so people literally killed their baby girls.
{All these protests are supported by the chinese communist party by the way.}
Black lives matter is run by a literal nazi collaborator George soros who bragged on television tricking jews into giving him their property was the "best time of his life." Black lives matter heads have direct ties to the Weather underground and antifa.... ITS A DOMESTIC TERROR ORGANISATION.
Are people who want to overthrow the United States REALLY crying about being detained illegally? grow a fucking pair of balls if you are trying to overthrow the biggest country in the world. Also if you are an anarchist why are you bitching about constitutional rights?? What a joke.
Portland is a disgusting liberal cesspool of crime it has one of the highest human trafficking rates and just TONS of crime and drug abuse in general. Cascadia by the way isnt even real because you are too lazy to even Secede properly
Last time i checked the border to mexico and canada aren't closed ;)
Two officers arrested him, read him his Miranda rights and then let him leave after asking him to waive his rights.
WOW DUDE HE MUST HAVE CRIED HIMSELF TO SLEEP ITS SO SCARY.
Is tear gas and rubber bullets really much compared to smashing out cop car windows and trying to pull them out to curb stomp them to death anyways? And what about the children shot by protesters fatally?
You do realize that you just listed three very different things (each of which has MANY various "schools"/branches/etc.) right?
Communism was described as a stateless, classless utopian ideal, which Marx and many others foolishly thought could be accomplished by eliminating capitalism through centralization (state socialism.) Anarchists have generally disagreed with that, realizing that the state and capitalism are one and the same - structures designed to protect & empower a small group of families. Look up Bakunin vs Marx.
Anarchy shows up with every potential economic variant: mutualism, capitalism, socialism, gift economy, post-scarcity access-based economy, and so many other models we haven't discovered yet. Anarchy literally translates to no rulers - nobody who is allowed to violate others without consequence.
I agree with you to varying degrees on many of the things you stated, like:
However, I disagree with any level of protecting/justifying violent organized crime syndicates like the "police" and the lumping of anarchism in with the authoritarian left.
Thank you for addressing this comment properly @kennyskitchen - you know how to describe the issues at play in this realm better than most. I also agree with "Constitutions and other paper proclamations are meaningless mythology to help keep slaves obedient" - but if we are speaking in terms of the rules that are supposed to be upheld by the Constitution for the sake of argument, then yes it is ALSO unconstitutional AND wrong. I was citing that for argument's sake, not because I completely agree with the document itself - just to be clear.
If you would do research you would see that the father of anarchism came up with all the major socialist ideals like social justice and the abolishment of private property.
And Adam Smith described clearly how "private property" leads to and is the main justification for the state.
I'm not so sure about the "Social Justice" comment; certainly while words like that were used, it was not in any way the same kind of propaganda or beliefs as are being pushed by post-post-modern intersectionalists.
I have read quite a bit of anarchist philosophy over the years, that's why I find it so valuable. Proudhon, Goldman, Kropotkin, Tucker, Parsons, Bakunin, Bookchin, Konkin, and many others. There is no logical way to immerse one's self in Anarchy and end up in authoritarian socialism - so if people are, it's an issue with them.
I would argue that the media & governments have been pushing the word "anarchist" to mean black masked agents of destruction, and the mainstream folks getting more and more pissed off at their slave-owners have taken that same definition and applied it to themselves.