Anarchy and Communism {socialism} is the stupidest shit I've ever heard in my life.
You do realize that you just listed three very different things (each of which has MANY various "schools"/branches/etc.) right?
Communism was described as a stateless, classless utopian ideal, which Marx and many others foolishly thought could be accomplished by eliminating capitalism through centralization (state socialism.) Anarchists have generally disagreed with that, realizing that the state and capitalism are one and the same - structures designed to protect & empower a small group of families. Look up Bakunin vs Marx.
Anarchy shows up with every potential economic variant: mutualism, capitalism, socialism, gift economy, post-scarcity access-based economy, and so many other models we haven't discovered yet. Anarchy literally translates to no rulers - nobody who is allowed to violate others without consequence.
I agree with you to varying degrees on many of the things you stated, like:
- Portland is an authoritarian, "intersectional" mess
- Protests & Riots being funded & guided by the parasite class
- Borders definitely not closed; I've been to Mexico and back since they "closed" them
- Constitutions and other paper proclamations are meaningless mythology to help keep slaves obedient
However, I disagree with any level of protecting/justifying violent organized crime syndicates like the "police" and the lumping of anarchism in with the authoritarian left.
Thank you for addressing this comment properly @kennyskitchen - you know how to describe the issues at play in this realm better than most. I also agree with "Constitutions and other paper proclamations are meaningless mythology to help keep slaves obedient" - but if we are speaking in terms of the rules that are supposed to be upheld by the Constitution for the sake of argument, then yes it is ALSO unconstitutional AND wrong. I was citing that for argument's sake, not because I completely agree with the document itself - just to be clear.
If you would do research you would see that the father of anarchism came up with all the major socialist ideals like social justice and the abolishment of private property.
And Adam Smith described clearly how "private property" leads to and is the main justification for the state.
I'm not so sure about the "Social Justice" comment; certainly while words like that were used, it was not in any way the same kind of propaganda or beliefs as are being pushed by post-post-modern intersectionalists.
I have read quite a bit of anarchist philosophy over the years, that's why I find it so valuable. Proudhon, Goldman, Kropotkin, Tucker, Parsons, Bakunin, Bookchin, Konkin, and many others. There is no logical way to immerse one's self in Anarchy and end up in authoritarian socialism - so if people are, it's an issue with them.
I would argue that the media & governments have been pushing the word "anarchist" to mean black masked agents of destruction, and the mainstream folks getting more and more pissed off at their slave-owners have taken that same definition and applied it to themselves.