A true test - flat earth - my favourite theory...not...
Can I do level four now? - I know I struggled with that when I did my flat earth post back in January :)
https://steemit.com/conspiracy/@sift666/the-flat-earth-con-bollocks-101
A true test - flat earth - my favourite theory...not...
Can I do level four now? - I know I struggled with that when I did my flat earth post back in January :)
https://steemit.com/conspiracy/@sift666/the-flat-earth-con-bollocks-101
i fully agree, earth is not a flat disc either. that part IS a psy op, but the EVEN BIGGER psy op is that we're on a ball spinning at 1038 mph in an even faster solar system, and it's all held together by a force no one has yet proven the existence of.
meanwhile, old-fashioned empirical experiments like michelson-morley, sagnac's turntables and airy's 'failure' proved the earth was definitely not in motion, even if they weren't necessarily trying to do so.
then you have the hoax moon landings - you are at that level, right?
or perhaps you agree with this statement: 'there are also a lot of images taken from the satellites, rockets and space junk that is orbiting around the planet, and although manned rockets have never actually landed on the moon there are no shortage of cameras floating around in the atmosphere.
And what the photos show is a spherical planet just like all of the others. '
please find such photos and post them please. no one has managed to find a single real shot yet. they're all composites or artwork, every one. prove me wrong.
Living on the coast I can see the horizon out of the window and watch huge cruise liners sail away and disappear from view.
I'll post some of my own photos that are fully legit.
Yes the moon landing was fake. But that is nothing to do with the shape of the earth, Stanley Kubrick filmed it in a studio.
And I fully agree with what that sift666 guy wrote - that is one of my other accounts :)
yes, you can, because of the way light and our perception work.
think about it, if ships were disappearing over the curve of the ocean then a telescope would not bring them back into view.
think about it, if the z axis is curving away from us, how come the x axis, the horizon, is never curved? is it only curved one way, like a cylinder?
while we agree the flat disc model is stupid, it doesn't mean we are on a spinning ball no one can feel any motion of.
if you know the moon landings are fake, then where does this 1972 shot of earth, supposedly taken on that fake mission, come from?
you know, the one, it's been used in posters and textbooks for decades to help convince people, along with holly wood sci-fi and theoretical physics, to not trust their own senses and believe the opposite of what they experience is the truth.
why is there little difference in experience at different latitudes of earth, when it's 1038 mph rotation should cause airplanes flying north/ south some difficulty, for example?
it's a mind-blower, but once you see it, you can never unsee it. such a shame about the 'official' flat earth model with the ice wall, what a load of non sense, designed to put people off realising they've been conned big time.
"if ships were disappearing over the curve of the ocean then a telescope would not bring them back into view"
just try that - you may find it doesn't help at all!
"where does this 1972 shot of earth, supposedly taken on that fake mission, come from?"
yes it's a fake - they all are but that doesn't mean the earth is flat. Atomic bombs are fake too, but that doesn't make the earth flat!
"the 'official' flat earth model with the ice wall, what a load of non sense"
indeed it is - but you have not offered an alternative!
all laid out at geek level
https://flatearthinsanity.blogspot.com/2016/08/flat-earth-follies-high-altitude.html
At least you two are playing nicely and not arguing.
'just try that - you may find it doesn't help at all!'
many have tried it - that's the point, we have evidence:
Any time we look out the window we can see the horizon - and it makes no difference what we look through - we can't see very far. We could see all the way to Antarctica if the world was flat.
In that first video he says the side of the ship is 1.5m tall - lol - it's a lot more than that!
The comments on those videos are hilarious - you may be the only believer
The cruise liners coming to Wellington that we can see out the window are over 50m tall
yes, ships disappear hull first, and? we already said it's the way light works and our perception of it. where is the x curve? wheere?
'We could see all the way to Antarctica if the world was flat.'
sorry, what? are you serious with that question?
meanwhile, here's a real one: do you know what the world record for the longest distance photograph is?