I have had some pretty horrible experiences in terms of what would be acceptable.
- I was called low trash, a scammer and racist remarks were even direct at our Devs
Posted via D.BuzzIt was never posted on-chain by @hivewatchers or any of the "abuse fighters" it was kept private
@chrisrice That's unfortunate and I can't comment to that. PS. Maybe it was @jaguar.force? I know he was over the line sometimes.. 😌
Just try to moderate your community appropriately and they should be fine with your project.
@chrisrice
These are utter lies. I will not tolerate this.
Provide evidence that I have ever directed such remarks towards you or your "devs".
Please post her the screenshots of these conversations!!!
You were quick to accuse me of lying @logic, and that's how quick you accuse others of lying, being scammers and ill-intended plageriasts.
Posted via D.BuzzTAG: @keys-defender @snacky @starkers @theycallmedan
Off-chain like where? Liar
Provide evidence. I want to see the screenshots to prove this:
You are a liar and I call you for what you are.
Like I said. I will not tolerate smearing lies.
Btw, I hadn't asked yet.
Posted via D.Buzzhttps://d.buzz
Ask @guiltyparties, and the other people who were there.
All of it was off-chain, and you + him communicate to users in a similar way
Posted via D.Buzz
Well, as a matter of fact he has been banned by their discord. The action of a single user does not represent the whole team.
Yeah, and he was banned shortly after my teams encouter with him, check the dates
People shouldn't be required to publish apologies on their blog, when in may cases, its just a misunderstanding.
Posted via D.Buzz
walden/jaguar.force HAS NEVER BEEN PART OF STEEMCLEANERS OR HIVEWATCHERS!!!
#GuiltyParties introduced me to him, and GP is the head of HW.
And are you against copy&pasting, spamming, farming and scamming in principle?
Posted via D.Buzz https://steemit.com/@steemcleaners
I have all the records of what I said to you. I was right.
You are free to publish it all on https://nextblog.d.buzz by using a Desktop version.
Btw, how have you been this last while?
Posted via D.BuzzI don't think you are fit to moderate content on #HIVE but . .
Ummm, we are a censorship resistany Web 3 Dapp.
Our agenda is free speech, nothing else, and we only remove links/images of:
And . . .
Posted via D.Buzz
And we'll create decentralized tools for users to moderate what THEY do and don't want to see for themselves.
Posted via D.BuzzIt's called decentralization, vs. a centralized nut job like @logic / @hivewatchers telling people what is good and bad content.
They already can mute accounts or follow the decentralized ban lists
Yeah, meaning there is no need for us to censor.
Posted via D.BuzzApparently @hivewatchers wants us to do more to police @dbuzz users but like I said, we only take action on purely blackhat abuse, not white or even dark grey.
what did you create?, your dbuzz shit still cant do shit after 7 months
It takes time since we are building everything from scratch, we are not just a fork and are self-funded
Do you have a website or an online project you built I can compare it to?
The #6 social Dapp in the world
Posted via D.Buzz https://www.stateofthedapps.com/rankings/category/social
I think that if you add plagiarism you’ll be on the same page of the “watchers”
Not so sure about that .... The "watchers" have a very twisted logic about "plagiarism"
Posted via D.Buzz
Yeah, not really.
But what are memes created for? Their created for sharing!
Posted via D.Buzz
I remember seeing another user whose posts and comments were down voted just because he voted on a meme he thought was funny (these memes were considered to be "plagiarised" ).
Posted via D.Buzz
Yeah, BS like that shows that @hivewatchers is not geared toward freedom but authoritarianism.
Posted via D.Buzz@guiltyparties = Competent when representing himself, but incompetent for using @logic as the front & center contact person
unfair practice on hive.
Posted via D.Buzzi 100% agree with you on 1. and 2. .... but imo @guiltyparties is approachable and much nicer towards his fellow hivers. He as himself would not create an
They targeted my mother for sharing her faith on chain with citation! I look forward to all dapps removing support for their bullshit lists.
I gave it a quick thought and I think you could improve the "spammy" reputation of your project having it automatically set the posts max payout based on the length of the "tweet":
ie.@chrisrice
And no, we don't have a "spammy reputation" we have a good one minus the @hivewatchers tyrant.
Posted via D.BuzzIt was only @logic, the autoritarian behind @hivewatchers.
We have skin in the game and a lot of it.
Our skin in the game is building an amazing use case, that adds value and makes our large investment worth it.
Posted via D.Buzz
I disagree that there should be any correlation between post size and max accepted value.
Wow, that does sound like an idea and we will likely impliment it.
We have a goos curatoe, not perfect since no one is, but good.
Posted via D.Buzz
@chrisrice I think that your pending release of blacklists and applying that scaled max_payout for text-only posts would calm down everyone.
Maybe I can even throw in the same for one dbuzz top creator every month.@christice as (non-elected) mediator between the 2 parts. I propose that if you apply the max_payout suggestion above, I will support the @dbuzz account adding it to my database so that @marcocasario will give it a $ 0.20 upvote every day.
No one here is against freedom of speech, the only issue is monetization of low quality or illegitimate content 👍
@chrisrice Addition: if you also automatically refuse payout in the dbuzz app for posts containing only one picture and max 100 characters I’ll increase the amount of dbuzz top accounts supported by @marcocasario to 4 every month. (All accounts voted by @marcocasario get also reblogged)
At least your trending page won't look like this:
Is that really worth a dollar? Debatable.
Or like this....
Everything under the sun is debatable.
Posted via D.Buzz@dbuzz has 350,000 HP so we don't necessarily need support in that respect it's kind, but the issue is the mismanagement ofHHW
Understood. Maybe just don’t get them used to get $ 1 for 10 words though..
Not necessarily. More users = more delegations and upvotes.
Meanwhile, many authors earn $30 - $60 USD per post.
Still a good system, but pennies are being argued over vs. dollars
Posted via D.Buzz
They do but (hopefully) most of them worked hard to get known and to get their content appreciated.
I know it’s just pennies but I think the argument of the “Hive watchers” is that your system could be abused by farmers and wouldn’t be easy to detect and control.
That could get to significant bucks removed from the pool (and therefore other users).
My point of view is that as far as those short tweets are contained within a community it’s not spam.
Okay, I can see the role being valuable but it doesn't mean they are doing a good job at it.
Posted via D.Buzz@hivewatchers is similar IMO
Also, let the #FreeMarket decide.
And our six figure investment in terms of USD results in success, if not, we lose.
Posted via D.BuzzWhy do we need @hivewatchers intervening and saying whatbis destined to succeed or fail?
@dbuzz has a very solid reputation.
lol