No evidence #5...
Now look at that photo of Nagasaki again - it has not been destroyed by a "nuclear" bomb has it?
"Nagasaki and Hiroshima were both a single bomb"
How on earth can you prove that - from news reports? LOL...
I did this on Steemit two years ago and was flooded with evidence back then :)
I did make 3 cents though!
https://steemit.com/life/@sift666/atomic-bombs-are-a-complete-con-job-they-don-t-even-exist
Dude. I am going to be blunt. Because you can't seem to get it. I answered my stance on this in my first reply to you. If you are skimming and not comprehending what I said there that is not my fault. You repeating shit isn't going to change that. Hell I answered with a variation on the same response a few replies later and kept it short and sweet.
No evidence #6...
"my stance"
that is my point really...
You mean your point that I told you I don't have time to do research for you going back and finding things I've read, seen, etc over the last three decades. Also telling you what constitutes proof to me, would likely be insufficient proof to you.
That is your point?
Can you read that? Did I say any words you don't know. If so let me know and I'll try to come up with a different way to say the exact same thing.
If you want to discuss. I'll discuss. If you want to do another no evidence #10 then fine, I'll let you have the last word. If you don't wish to go that route then it may not be the last word and the discussion may continue.
All I want is for you to stop avoiding the issue - lack of evidence - by providing photo or video evidence - I'll stop doing the # thing now that you are into double figures... And I'm getting worried that you might go off like a bomb.
And I wasn't avoiding lack of evidence. I was clear about that. Anything I considered evidence I encountered more than three decades ago in some cases. Before the internet. No way I can recall or find everything I saw. So I can't even look at the old stuff I saw with fresh eyes. Now while I could search, and search, and perhaps find it... I have so many other things to do that I have zero interest in devoting time to doing that. If I was bored, I'd be more than happy. It has been many years since I've been bored.
OK I'll try a different approach - I can't post a video because none exist - so I'm saying you can't either - proving me wrong would be evidence - now that is two more replies showing you have no evidence so you have proved my point many times over now
"So I can't even look at the old stuff I saw"
that's because it was all the original sketchy looking fake ones were removed from the internet more than five years ago
but this one remains - you might like this utter bullshit! (scary thing is some Americans believe this is real - LOL)
I actually think most of that is real. I'll have to see the other material you provided, yet I might have to provide you a post on why. As I said I make effects fairly regularly, and I have kept my thumb on special effects done by people better than me, or with far better equipment. I know the techniques they use. I know certain things to look for. Many of those images would be very difficult to make even today, and they are much older than that. Yet you'd have to know what I look for to state that.
So what makes me think they are real? Thinking about how to make those images/videos. Then even thinking about when they were produced. You can take old special effects techniques, new special effects techniques, etc.
While there are some impressive looking mushroom clouds and explosions in movies, video games, etc and more coming out all the time. If you know what to look for you can see things that are not present in these videos but they do exist in the special effects recreations.
Now if I do that I'll have to take screenshots and analyze them and find out when they were made, etc. Yet I can tell you that in the brief watch there I saw a great many little details that have nothing to do with the subject matter that made be think they were genuine.
This is not as shaky as the moon landing stuff where we did have the ability at that time to fake everything we saw, and there is a strong possibility a lot of that actually did occur.
These explosions are all what is known as a particle effect. You could make smaller explosions yet they only have part of the motion, but I am also watching the clouds, looking for regular obvious repeating patterns, composting of images, etc.
I didn't see any of that in my one watch of this video and I was actively looking for it. We'll see tomorrow as I need to read and review your other material before making an actual reply.
Most of it I saw was before the internet, so it'd only make it onto the internet if someone decided to archive it. There is a lot of pre-internet stuff that never has made it onto the internet. Some places worked on digitizing things, but so much was never touched.
I suspect some of what I saw on the subject was even on Real to Real camera projector type stuff.
I'd simply figure I was being trolled and decide it was a waste of my time. ;)
I'm not trolling, just curious to see if you ever grasp that every time you reply without any evidence you are proving my point
Not as far as I'm concerned as I already told you at the outset I don't have time to do that research. Anything we discuss beyond that point is simply a discussion. Expecting me to do something I already said I wasn't going to do and continuing to converse with you proves nothing.
I won't say I know they are real like @jrcornel.
I simply currently weigh probabilities based upon a life of reading and research that I am not going to regurgitate for you that the probability is strongly in the favor of them existing.
I don't BELIEVE anything except that my mind will change as I encounter new data, and have new thoughts.
No evidence #7...
"I don't BELIEVE anything except that my mind will change as I encounter new data, and have new thoughts"
evidence of that with this subject?
You haven't presented any new evidence yet that I've found convincing. In fact, I've offered you counter explanations to what you are presenting as evidence which you dismiss and say "no evidence #X". I'll say I don't see any evidence from you yet either. ;)
Well, on my old Steemit post there are at least four solid bits of evidence - VERY SOLID - including photos, cancer rates, and more in the links and comments - eg.
https://www.big-lies.org/nuke-lies/www.nukelies.com/forum/3-nuclear-weapon-scams-history.html
Now just in case you want to see all the original propaganda photos of this bomb bullshit - all here:
https://www.alternatewars.com/Bomb_Loading/Bomb_Guide.htm
Only catch is there are no photos of it going off - of course - because it didn't...
Well that helps. That gives me something to actually look at. I will look at it. It may not be until tomorrow. I'm getting ready to make a night run to the data center. I have to take a 2U 12 drive (4TB each) NAS server I've been repairing back and rack it and recable it. I typically wait until after rush hour to do that type of stuff.
More info - note that whale often wont open in the zionist chrome browser but will in other browsers
http://www.whale.to/c/trinitymarhis.pdf
"In short, you can rest easier on this matter, because there is no chance we dropped any nuclear
bombs on Japan. It simply didn't happen. Japan knows that, Russia knows that, and the only ones
who don't know that are the citizens of the US, who have been propagandized into a state of mass
idiocy. The whole nuclear scare wasn't used mainly to keep the Russians at bay (since the Russians
also never had any nukes). It was used mainly to keep US citizens in a state just short of panic for 70 years, and to keep military and Intelligence expenditures absurdly high"
Have a good trip.
Chrome has been getting increasingly worse. I use it for some work related stuff, but rarely use it for anything personal such as this. I'll check out all the stuff you shared tomorrow.
One thing I'll say about the cancer rates. They also said nothing would grow in Nagasaki/Hiroshima for a long time, but they had melons the next year.
That doesn't disprove atomic bombs. It does back up that a lot of people make predictions about what will happen without actually knowing. :)
Michael Crichton addressed that exact issue in the post I did on Aliens and Global Warming today.
No evidence #8...
"They also said nothing would grow in Nagasaki/Hiroshima for a long time, but they had melons the next year"
"That doesn't disprove atomic bombs"
well actually...
Now on the Dresden/Tokyo connection...
Are you saying Nagasaki and Hiroshima were leveled by regular bombing runs like Tokyo and Dresden or are you implying that the photos provided allegedly of Nagasaki and Hiroshima are just recycled Dresden and Tokyo pictures? I've been operating off of the concept you are indicating we could level a city more effectively than an atomic bomb allegedly did if you look at Tokyo and Dresden. Thus my hammer analogy.
No evidence #9...
"Are you saying Nagasaki and Hiroshima were leveled by regular bombing runs like Tokyo and Dresden"
YES!